Losing Touch with Jesus and how to Find Him Again (Song 5:2–6:3)
In the previous poem, the King and his beloved were together in one of
his gardens. Now they are separated and she is in her own house again. The
differences in the poems depict for us the various experiences of the Christian
life.
In this new poem, the woman is in bed when the king comes calling and
asks to see her. The initial response of the woman is reluctance to get up
because she will have to get dressed. Yet she has strong affections for him and
even when she heard him touch the handle she was thrilled. Therefore, she
arose, put fragrances on her hands, and opened the door. To her great surprise
and sorrow, he was gone. This caused her to engage in a process of finding him.
It is not too difficult for us to apply this to the Christian life. Jesus
can come to visit us at any time. Like the King in the poem, he says many
loving things to us and he can mention the effects of the journey he has made
in order to get to us. All of his comments are encouraging. Yet we are in a
state of spiritual lethargy and his words to us do not move us. We can even
come up with a list of reasonable excuses for not reacting properly. Still we
love the signs of his presence and eventually we do something about it, such as
taking up the Bible or going to a church service, perhaps even making some
preparation (pictured by the woman putting fragrance on her fingers). Yet when
we get there, we do not sense him.
Why does this happen? It happens because knowing Jesus is not the
priority. We can replace that priority with various things such as hobbies,
religious activities and even our own spiritual comfort.
When that happens, we can do one of two things. One option is to assume
that we had done nothing wrong in not responding immediately and perhaps
someone or something else is to blame for the sense of the absence of Jesus.
The other option is to start seeking for him. This is what the women did in the
poem – she started to look for her beloved. What did she do?
The first thing that she did was to search for him and call for him. No
doubt, we can see in this a picture of earnest prayer in which we cry to Jesus
to come and have fellowship with him again. This calling the woman did by
herself, a reminder of the importance of personal prayer in recovering
fellowship.
The second thing that she did was to seek help from the watchmen, those
who looked after the city. She had known help from them before when she had lost
the sense of her beloved’s presence. On this occasion, she received a different
kind of help when they beat her and bruised her and made her shame known. In
passing, we can see that this incident is not literal because which watchmen
would dare attack the beloved of the king. The watchmen of the city are the
pastors of the church and they beat her in the sense that they point out her
sins to her.
The third thing that she does is engage the help of her friends, the
daughters of Jerusalem (v. 8). This is a picture of a Christian asking
fellow-believers to bring her case to Jesus when they pray to him. She asks
them to tell him that she loves him deeply. This is an interesting way to pray
for one another. Instead of mentioning faults, we mention their graces.
The friends respond to her concerns by asking her two simple questions.
The first concerns what she thinks of her beloved (v. 9) and the second
concerns whether or not she actually knows where he is (v. 6). What the friends
are doing is trying to get the woman to think properly alongside her strong
affections.
Her description of
the King (5:10-16)
In answer to their first question, the woman gives an all-round
description of her King. We miss the point, I think, if we try and find a
corresponding detail in Jesus for each detail that she mentions, although there
is no harm in doing so. Her description points to his youth, strength and
tenderness. Her example should lead us to consider as much truth about Jesus as
we can. We should range all over his abilities, activities and aims. After all,
we want everyone to know that we have a perfect Saviour. He possesses the
abilities of God – all divine attributes are his. He is involved in all the
activities of God, as well as the ones that are unique to him as the Son of
God. He helps bring about the plans of God for the future.
What could a believer in such a state say about Jesus? Here are some
suggestions. (1) Although I have sinned in being lazy, he is the same
yesterday, today and forever. I have changed, but he does not. (2) He is very
gracious and he will not deal with me in the way my sins deserve. (3) Although
I have sinned, I still find myself being drawn after him, which indicates that
he is working secretly in my soul and causing me to love him still. (4) He is
strong and kind, and is able to rebuke me without being cruel.
Perhaps the most important words in her description is the personal
pronoun, ‘my,’ which she uses at the beginning and the end of her summary. That
personal pronoun points to possession, to having what she regards as precious.
And she uses it even although she knows he has gone. His absence does not lead
her to conclude that the loss is permanent.
It is interesting to observe that she has no complaints to make about the
manner in which he had left. Perhaps someone might suggest that the way he left
was rather abrupt. Yet he had made efforts to rouse her. Even when he put his
hand in the door, he could have opened it and come in. But he wanted her to
move. After all, the woman depicts someone who has been given life.
The challenge that comes to us from her response to the question of the
daughters is to be ready to speak to other believers about what the King means
to us. It is out of the abundance of the heart that the mouth speaks. If there
is little in the heart, there will not be much to say.
The friends were trying to get the woman to stop thinking about her
mistake and instead to think about her beloved. We too should divert sorrowful
believers to think about our King, and the best way to do so is by saying
wonderful things about the Saviour.
The second
question and the answer (6:1-3)
Having listened to her beautiful description of the king, the daughters
of Jerusalem then ask if she knows where he has gone to, and they promise to go
with her and find him. She knows where he has gone, to his garden.
It is worth noting the name that they give to her in verse 1. They regard
her as the most beautiful among women. There is no one so beautiful to a
Christian than another believer seeking the Saviour out of love for his
presence. In addition to valuing her beauty, they also know that she will be a
help to them in locating the King, even although they have not lost the sense
of his presence in the particular way that she had done.
What does the garden here depict? It was a large location where Solomon
and the woman with her friends could meet together (it was really a collection
of gardens, as we can see from the use of the plural in 6:2). It was also a
pleasant location where they could meet together because of its beauty. Part of
its beauty was the various beds in which there was a variety of spices and
flowers. In the garden, the king is likened to a deer who grazes and a gardener
who gathers lilies. He is also said to graze among the lilies. So it is a place
where the king in particular finds rest and satisfaction.
In the Old Testament, God found rest among his people, as David points
out in Psalm 132. There is a sense in which the land of Canaan was intended to
be a place where God would rest with his people. As far as we are concerned,
the place of rest is where the King gives blessings to his people.
Obviously, this includes the activities of the church in its means of grace, but I think it goes beyond that. It is where they can have fellowship together and where they receive from him the blessings of joy and peace.
The outcome of her being in the garden of the King is that she finds
great assurance. Yet she expresses her assurance in a distinct way because she
realises what she means to him as well as what he means to her. The poem will
continue with expressions of love and joy, and we will consider them next time.
But we should notice that the woman who failed received great assurance when
she went to where the King could be found. This raises the question as to the
strength of our assurance. We never get much assurance by looking at ourselves.
Which believer is content with his prayers or his devotions? The more he
examines them the more flaws he will find. Yet we could also say that we may
not get much assurance by considering God in the majesty of his perfection. We
should focus on God and be amazed at his greatness. Yet amazement is not the
same as assurance.
Assurance comes by considering what the God of infinite grace did for
sinners, and it is usually connected to Jesus. We should consider him as he
goes to the cross for sinners and as he goes to the crown for sinners. We
should look back to where he has been and why, and we should look up to where
he is and why he is there, and we should look ahead to what he will yet do and
why he will do them. And as we look in all these directions, we should fill our
minds with the divine promises connected to them. When we do that, we will be
able to look within and say that in spite of ourselves Jesus is for us, and
that is assurance.
Comments
Post a Comment