Christ Died for Our Sins (1 Cor. 15:1-4)
This sermon was preached on 30/6/2013
What
is the gospel? No doubt several answers could be given from a theological point
of view. We know that it is important to distinguish the true message of God
from the false messages that have affected the church throughout history. After
all, we have an enemy who hates to hear that the gospel is spreading and who
knows that distortions are more effective than physical opposition in achieving
that task.
Yet
we also know that there is a basic gospel message, such as is encapsulated in
John 3:16, at one time the best known verse in the Bible, and which contains
the essential concepts a person needs to hear in order to be saved, such as the
meaning of God’s love, God’s persons, God’s sacrifice, God’s wrath and God as
the source of eternal life. This verse used to be called ‘the gospel in a
nutshell’. In a sense, that famous verse describes the gospel from God the
Father’s point of view.
Paul,
here in 1 Corinthians 15:1-4, summarises the gospel for his readers, and tells them
and us that they had received it by faith when they heard it preached to them.
Receiving is a very simple way of depicting faith in Jesus. It describes an
acceptance, marked by eagerness because more is anticipated from experiencing
the gift. That, of course, is the story of the Christian life.
At
the same time, there is loyalty to the Saviour expected of those who accept the
gospel. Lack of such loyalty was one of the problems in Corinth, perhaps the
cause of all the other problems that are dealt with by Paul in this letter.
They were expected to stand, to remain committed to it.
Paul
also informs them that the gospel continues to save them. Maybe this is not an
emphasis we hear often. Yet we have to remember that salvation is a threefold
matter: we were saved, we are being saved, and we will be saved. Someone has
said that in the past, when we believed in Jesus, we were delivered from the
penalty of sin, that in the present, we are saved from the power of sin, and
that in the future we will be saved from the presence of sin, either when we
die or, if we live until Jesus returns, at the second coming.
The
proof that we are standing is that we value the gospel. An essential way of
experiencing the assurance that our sins have been forgiven is by thinking
about the gospel; an effective way of dealing with the power of sin is by
thinking about the gospel because usually sin is in our thinking before it is
in our actions; and an expectant way of anticipating the future is by looking
forward to what the gospel says about God’s people being removed from all
contact with sin, whether in themselves or in their environment.
When
did Paul receive the gospel?
The
answer must be that he received it round about the time of his experience of
Jesus on the Damascus Road, whether at the moment he encountered Jesus for the
first time or shortly afterwards. Many things could be said about that
occasion, but Paul clearly discovered that Jesus actually was who his followers
said he was, that he had been crucified and now was risen from the dead. Paul
already had a profound knowledge of the Old Testament scriptures, of what it
said would take place in order for God’s salvation to be discovered. And as he
thought about what was claimed for Jesus he would see how many Old Testament
passages now made sense. So we should not be surprised to see his emphases here
on the fulfilment of the scriptures.
Who
is the gospel about?
Paul
here says it is about Christ. We may not be struck by the use of this title
because many people think it is merely the surname of Jesus. Yet we know that
it is far more than that. It is the Greek equivalent of the Hebrew Messiah. Now
a lot could be said about what the Old Testament says about him. But here is a
quick summary of what one book, Genesis says about him.
The
Messiah is first mentioned in Genesis 3 as the Seed of the Woman, the champion
who would come to deliver the human race, but who would be hurt in the process.
Then in Genesis 10, we read about Enoch who predicted that the Messiah would
judge the world. In Genesis 12, we discover that the Messiah would be a
descendant of Abraham and through him the world would be blessed, and this line
is further defined as being through Isaac, Jacob and Judah.
Moreover,
the New Testament says Jesus is like the obscure priest called Melchizedek,
mentioned in two verses in Genesis 14. This is not merely a New Testament idea
because the author of Psalm 110 also noted the similarity. This otherwise
unknown priest depicted the deity of Jesus (no beginning to his genealogy),
combined two roles in one person (king and priest), and provided two blessings
for others (righteousness and peace).
We
could go through most books of the Old Testament and discover that many things
are said about the future Messiah. The point is that a
great deal is said about him, and no detail is unimportant. Truly he is a
wonderful person. And the gospel is about him.
Christ
died for our sins – six aspects
The
first detail that can be connected to this statement is that the death of Jesus
on the cross was a fact of history. It is interesting that no one seems to have
disputed this fact. After all, the claim could easily be disproved by people of
the time by merely saying where he was. Yet we cannot forget that the cross was
physical.
Second,
the Old Testament says why Jesus died. It was for our sins that he was
crucified. Paul knew that Jesus a sacrifice on the cross and he knew several
other features connected to it. To begin with, he would have known that every
sacrificial victim had to be flawless, without even a mark as a defect. This
emphasis was stressed in numerous ways such as the choice of animal for the
daily sacrifice, or the Passover sacrifice, or by personal offerings a
worshipper made. Jesus was perfect in
thought, word and deed.
Third,
the Old Testament predicted that there would be a sacrifice that would be punitive. The Sufferer would endure the
anger of God against sin. The Lord had indicated that the main source of
suffering would be through him punishing the Messiah because he was bearing the
sin of his people and doing so lovingly.
Fourth,
the Old Testament anticipated a sacrifice that would have permanent effect as a result. One of the obvious problems of the
Jewish ritual was the necessity of constant repetition. It may have been the
case that the hardest workers in Israel were the priests on duty at the temples
because they offered numerous required sacrifices daily on behalf of
worshippers. Yet all their hard work was pointless because those sacrifices
could not take away sin or bear its punishment. Jesus' sacrifice has permanent
effects.
Fifth,
the Old Testament predicted that pardon
would be given to the transgressors because of the Sufferer. It had predicted
that when he was numbered with the transgressors he would make intercession for
them. A literal example of this was when he prayed for the group of soldiers who
crucified him, and they confessed later that he was the Son of God. The longing
for pardon is one of the basic desires that people conscious of their sins
have.
Sixth,
the Old Testament indicated that there would be a dramatic ingathering of people into the family of God. Often
this ingathering is depicted as a regathering of Israel, yet when we look at
who will be included we find among them individuals from all nations, some of
whom belonged to nations that showed great hostility to the people of God and
tried to wipe them out.
Comments
Post a Comment